The effect of testing distance on intraocular lens power calculation.
نویسندگان
چکیده
The calculation of the intraocular lens (IOL) power required for a specific patient typically uses a “lens constant” back-calculated from the refractive outcomes of earlier surgical results.1,2 An early recommendation was for clinicians to personalize their own lens constants to address systematic errors. However, the introduction of phacoemulsification equipment, continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis, modern foldable IOLs, and non-contact optical measurements of the eye has led to small-incision surgery methods that vary little between surgeons. IOL power calculations and lens constants have therefore become broadly similar between clinics, and it has become possible, in principle, to pool clinical results to arrive at global mean values for lens constants.2 This approach is particularly useful when a new lens model is introduced because data from far fewer patients per surgeon are needed and most new users can potentially start with a value that is already almost optimized. However, something that was never standardized is the test distance used for refraction. The traditional test distance for far vision and refraction is 6 m (20 ft). This goes back 150 years to the work of Snellen, Donders, and other authors,3 with “6/6” and “20/20” being universally accepted as indications of excellent vision. The upper number in the “Snellen fraction” denotes the actual test distance for a chart that has a minimum feature size for this acuity of 1 minute of arc (although this distance parameter is not always specified in published data). In practice, there is an ambiguity because the entire region from 4 m to infinity is assumed to represent “distance vision,” which means that not all refractive data have the same basis. Furthermore, IOL standards indicate that refractions at 4 m should be adjusted to infinity rather than to the standard test distance when measurements are made during a clinical study.4 The effect of the test distance on the measured refraction is illustrated schematically in Figure 1 for eyes having their far points at infinity or 6 or 4 m. The differences are relatively small, but a refraction change of 0.25 diopter (D) typically represents a 0.4-D change in the A-constant because the IOL is located deep in the eye.1 The lens constant is averaged over many patients and its potential accuracy is much higher than the refraction accuracy for a single patient. We suggest that testing distances and “least minus” refractions be standardized to 6 m so that different data sets can be placed on a common basis. This also has the advantage of leaving the eyes slightly myopic, allowing pseudophakes to make full use of their available depth-of-focus to attain satisfactory far and intermediate vision.5 Refractions at other test distances can be converted to standard 6-m values by adjusting for the vergence distance by adding (1/6 – 1/[test distance in meters]) to the spherical equivalent refraction. A value of -0.08 D would be added to the spherical equivalent for measurements at 4 m and +0.17 D to refractions corresponding to infinity to convert them to 6-m values.
منابع مشابه
Visual and Refractive Results of Cataract Surgery by Phacoemulsification Method in Patients with Keratoconus
Purpose: To examine the visual and refractive results of cataract surgery by phacoemulsification method in patients with keratoconus. Methods: In this retrospective study, the files of patients with keratoconus, who underwent phacoemulsification between 2008 and 2017, were evaluated. The intraocular lens power calculation formula was SRK/T. Post-operative visual and refractive results were anal...
متن کاملمقایسهی کراتومتری پنتاکم وکراتومتری IOL Master در محاسبهی لنز داخل چشمی افراد با قرنیهی طبیعی
Background and Objective: Proper method and machine for corneal evaluation is an important factor in many anterior segment interventions. This study was performed to compare the mean keratometry (K) readings obtained with an IOL Master and Pentacam for intraocular lens power calculation in normal subjects with no history of refractive surgery. Materials and Methods: Mean K values were obtained ...
متن کاملDistance protection closed-loop testing using RTDS
This paper presents a distance protection test procedure by applying the Real-Time Digital Simulator (RTDS) of a power system. RTDS is a tool to design, develop, and test power-system protection. The RTDS enables real-time computation of electromagnetic phenomena with a calculation time step of even 50μs. The hardware allows the import and export of many signals from the simulator to an ext...
متن کاملPart A: Biometry and Intraocular Lens Power Calculation
Formulas For Intraocular lens Power calculatIon Modern cataract surgery replaces the natural lens of the eye with an intraocular lens (IOL). After surgery, the optical system of the eye will consist of two major refractive elements, the cornea and the newly inserted IOL. This two-lens system is at the basis of IOL power calculation. To facilitate calculations, both the cornea and the IOL are co...
متن کاملPrediction of Refractive Outcome of Second Eye with Partial Adjustment of Intraocular Lens Power of the First Eye
Background and Objective: This study aimed at comparing the results of refractive cataract surgery in patients undergoing sequential surgeries in both eyes. Considering the preoperative refraction and final refraction of the first eye, it is possible to correct the refrative result of cataract surgery using the adjustment of the second eye intraocular lens (IOL) power. Materials and Methods: T...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Journal of refractive surgery
دوره 30 11 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2014